Difference between revisions of "Ambient space"
m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[table of contents]] | [[table of contents]] | ||
− | This section constructs topological ambient spaces <math>\mathcal{X}(\underline{x})</math> of the [[moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons]] <math>\overline\mathcal{M}(\underline{x})=\overline\partial_{J,Y}^{-1}(0)</math>, within which polyfold theory will construct the [[regularized moduli spaces]] <math>\overline\mathcal{M}(\underline{x};\nu)</math>. | + | This section constructs topological ambient spaces <math>\mathcal{X}(\underline{x})</math> of the [[moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons]] <math>\overline\mathcal{M}(\underline{x})=\overline\partial_{J,Y}^{-1}(0)</math>, within which polyfold theory will construct the [[regularized moduli spaces]] <math>\overline\mathcal{M}(\underline{x};\nu)</math>. These will depend only on the choice of a Sobolev decay constant <math>\delta>0</math>. |
Thus we are given <math>d+1\geq 1</math> Lagrangians <math>L_0,\ldots,L_d\subset M</math> (indexed cyclically by <math>i\in \Z_{d+1}</math>) and generators <math>x_0\in\text{Crit}(L_0,L_d),</math> <math>x_1\in\text{Crit}(L_0,L_1), \ldots,</math> <math>x_d\in\text{Crit}(L_{d-1},L_d)</math> of their morphism spaces. The latter depend on the choice of Hamiltonian symplectomorphisms <math>\phi_i:=\phi_{L_{i-1},L_i}</math> so that we have <math>\phi_i(L_{i-1})\pitchfork L_i</math> whenever <math>L_{i-1}\neq L_i</math>, as specified in [[polyfold constructions for Fukaya categories]] and [[moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons]]. | Thus we are given <math>d+1\geq 1</math> Lagrangians <math>L_0,\ldots,L_d\subset M</math> (indexed cyclically by <math>i\in \Z_{d+1}</math>) and generators <math>x_0\in\text{Crit}(L_0,L_d),</math> <math>x_1\in\text{Crit}(L_0,L_1), \ldots,</math> <math>x_d\in\text{Crit}(L_{d-1},L_d)</math> of their morphism spaces. The latter depend on the choice of Hamiltonian symplectomorphisms <math>\phi_i:=\phi_{L_{i-1},L_i}</math> so that we have <math>\phi_i(L_{i-1})\pitchfork L_i</math> whenever <math>L_{i-1}\neq L_i</math>, as specified in [[polyfold constructions for Fukaya categories]] and [[moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons]]. | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
− | where | + | where the data is the same as in the construction of the [[moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons]] <math>\overline\mathcal{M}(\underline{x})</math>, except for maps not necessarily being pseudoholomorphic but just of Sobolev <math>H^{3,\delta}</math>-regularity. We indicate these differences in boldface. |
1. <math>T</math> is an ordered tree with sets of vertices <math>V=V^m \cup V^c</math> and edges <math>E</math>, | 1. <math>T</math> is an ordered tree with sets of vertices <math>V=V^m \cup V^c</math> and edges <math>E</math>, | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
that is each <math>v\in V^m</math> is labeled by a continuous map <math>u_v: \Sigma^v\to M</math> satisfying a '''Sobolev regularity''', Lagrangian boundary conditions, and matching conditions as follows: | that is each <math>v\in V^m</math> is labeled by a continuous map <math>u_v: \Sigma^v\to M</math> satisfying a '''Sobolev regularity''', Lagrangian boundary conditions, and matching conditions as follows: | ||
<div class="mw-collapsible-content"> | <div class="mw-collapsible-content"> | ||
− | * '''TODO: Sobolev regularity - and make sure it implies uniform convergence''' | + | * '''TODO: <math>H^{3,\delta}</math>-Sobolev regularity - and make sure it implies uniform convergence''' |
* The Lagrangian boundary conditions are <math>u_v(\partial \Sigma^v)\subset \underline{L}^v</math>; more precisely this requires <math>u_v\bigl( (\partial \Sigma^v)_e \bigr)\subset L^v_e</math> for each adjacent edge <math>e\in E_v</math>. | * The Lagrangian boundary conditions are <math>u_v(\partial \Sigma^v)\subset \underline{L}^v</math>; more precisely this requires <math>u_v\bigl( (\partial \Sigma^v)_e \bigr)\subset L^v_e</math> for each adjacent edge <math>e\in E_v</math>. | ||
* The finite energy condition is <math>\textstyle \int_{\Sigma^v} u_v^*\omega <\infty</math>. | * The finite energy condition is <math>\textstyle \int_{\Sigma^v} u_v^*\omega <\infty</math>. |
Revision as of 21:22, 7 June 2017
This section constructs topological ambient spaces of the moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons , within which polyfold theory will construct the regularized moduli spaces . These will depend only on the choice of a Sobolev decay constant .
Thus we are given Lagrangians (indexed cyclically by ) and generators of their morphism spaces. The latter depend on the choice of Hamiltonian symplectomorphisms so that we have whenever , as specified in polyfold constructions for Fukaya categories and moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons.
Then - as set - we define the ambient space as
where the data is the same as in the construction of the moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons , except for maps not necessarily being pseudoholomorphic but just of Sobolev -regularity. We indicate these differences in boldface.
1. is an ordered tree with sets of vertices and edges ,
equipped with orientations towards the root, orderings of incoming edges, and a partition into main and critical (leaf and root) vertices as follows:
- The edges are oriented towards the root vertex of the tree, so that each vertex has a unique outgoing edge (except for the root vertex which has no outgoing edge) and a (possibly empty) set of incoming edges .
- The set of incoming edges is ordered, . This induces a cyclic order on the set of all edges adjacent to , by setting , and we will denote consecutive edges in this order by . In particular this yields .
- The set of vertices is partitioned into the sets of main vertices and critical vertices . The latter is ordered to start with the root and then contains d leaves of the tree, with order induced by the orientation and order of the edges.
- The root vertex has a single edge , and this attaches to a main vertex except for one special case: For and we allow the tree with a single edge between its two critical vertices .
2. The tree structure induces tuples of Lagrangians
that label the boundary components of domains in overall counter-clockwise order as follows:
- For each main vertex the Lagrangian label is a cyclic sequence of Lagrangians indexed by the adjacent edges (which will become the boundary condition on ).
- For each edge the Lagrangian labels satisfy a matching condition as follows:
- The edge from a critical leaf requires .
- The edge to the critical root requires .
- Any edge between main vertices requires and .
- Since has no further leaves, this determines the Lagrangian labels uniquely.
3. is a tuple of generalized Morse trajectories
in the following compactified Morse trajectory spaces:
- Any edge from a critical leaf to a main vertex is labeled by a half-infinite Morse trajectory if , resp. by the constant in the discrete space if .
- If the edge to the root attaches to a main vertex then it is labeled by a half-infinite Morse trajectory if , resp. by the constant in the discrete space if .
- An edge between critical vertices is labeled by an infinite Morse trajectory (this occurs only for with and the tree with one edge ).
- Any edge between main vertices is labeled by a finite or infinite Morse trajectory in case , resp. by a constant in the discrete space in case . (Recall the matching condition and from 2.)
4. is a tuple of boundary points
that correspond to the edges of , are ordered counter-clockwise, and associate complex domains to the vertices as follows:
- For each main vertex there are pairwise disjoint marked points on the boundary of a disk.
- The order of the edges corresponds to a counter-clockwise order of the marked points .
- The marked points can also be denoted as and by the edges for which or
- To each main vertex we associate the punctured disk . Then the marked points partition the boundary into connected components such that the closure of each component contains the marked points .
5. is a tuple of sphere bubble tree attaching points for each main vertex , given by an unordered subset of the interior of the domain.
6. is a tuple of sphere bubble trees indexed by the disjoint union of sphere bubble tree attaching points.
7. is a tuple of not-necessarily-pseudoholomorphic maps for each main vertex,
that is each is labeled by a continuous map satisfying a Sobolev regularity, Lagrangian boundary conditions, and matching conditions as follows:
- TODO: -Sobolev regularity - and make sure it implies uniform convergence
- The Lagrangian boundary conditions are ; more precisely this requires for each adjacent edge .
- The finite energy condition is .
- The matching conditions for sphere bubble trees are for each main vertex and sphere bubble tree attaching point .
- The Sobolev regularity implies uniform convergence of near each puncture , and the limits are required to satisfy the following matching conditions:
- For edges whose Lagrangian boundary conditions agree, the map extends smoothly to the puncture , and its value is required to match with the evaluation of the Morse trajectory associated to the edge , that is for .
- For edges with different Lagrangian boundary conditions , the map has a uniform limit for some , and this limit intersection point is required to match with the value of the constant 'Morse trajectory' associated to the edge , that is .
8. The generalized pseudoholomorphic polygon is stable
in the sense that TODO: update to Ham pert.
any main vertex whose map has zero energy has enough special points to have trivial isotropy, that is the number of boundary marked points plus twice the number of interior marked points is at least 3.
Finally, two generalized pseudoholomorphic polygons are equivalent if
there is a tree isomorphism and a tuple of disk biholomorphisms which preserve the tree, Morse trajectories, marked points, and maps in the sense that
- preserves the tree structure and order of edges;
- for every ;
- for every and adjacent edge ;
- for every ;
- for every and ;
- the maps are related by reparametrization, for every .
The symplectic area function
If no Hamiltonian perturbations are involved in the construction of a moduli space of generalized pseudoholomorphic polygons - i.e. if for each pair the Lagrangians are either identical or transverse - then the symplectic area function on the moduli space is defined by
which - since only depends on the total homology class of the generalized polygon
Here is defined by unique continuous continuation to the punctures at which or .
Differential Geometric TODO:
In the presence of Hamiltonian perturbations, the definition of the symplectic area function needs to be adjusted to match with the symplectic action functional on the Floer complexes and satisfy some properties (which also need to be proven in the unperturbed case):
- is invariant under deformations with fixed limits (used in proof of A-infty relations and invariance);
- a bound on needs to imply Gromov-compactness ... which requires an area-energy identity for J-curves, but we are allowed (bounded!) error terms from e.g. Hamiltonian perturbations;
- invariance proofs arguing with 'upper triangular form' require contributions to to be of positive symplectic area, or constant strips/disks for zero symplectic area;
- to work with the Novikov ring, rather than field, the symplectic area needs to be nonnegative for all polygons (not just the strips and other contributions to for which this is automatic). It *might* be possible to achieve this by remembering that the Hamilton functions for each pair of Lagrangians are only fixed up to a constant (not see in the Hamiltonian vector field or time-1-flow), so when constructing the Hamiltonian perturbation vector fields over Deligne-Mumford spaces, it might be possible to shift e.g. the outgoing Hamiltonian in such a way that the vector field can be constructed with 'curvature terms of the correct sign'.
Sphere bubble trees
The sphere bubble trees that are relevant to the compactification of the moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons are genus zero stable maps with one marked point, as described in e.g. [Chapter 5, McDuff-Salamon]. For a fixed almost complex structure , we can use the combinatorial simplification of working with a single marked point to construct the moduli space of sphere bubble trees as
where
1. is a tree with sets of vertices and edges , and a distinguished root vertex , which we use to orient all edges towards the root.
2. is a tuple of marked points on the spherical domains ,
indexed by the edges of , and including a special root marked point as follows:
- For each vertex the tuple of mutually disjoint marked points is indexed by the edges adjacent to .
- For the root vertex the tuple of mutually disjoint marked points is also indexed by the edges adjacent to , but is also required to be disjoint from the fixed marked point .
- The marked points, except for , can also be denoted as and by the edges .
3. is a tuple of pseudoholomorphic spheres for each vertex,
that is each is labeled by a smooth map satisfying Cauchy-Riemann equation, finite energy, and matching conditions as follows:
- The Cauchy-Riemann equation is .
- The finite energy condition is .
- The matching conditions are for each edge .
4. The sphere bubble tree is stable
in the sense that
any vertex whose map has zero energy (which is equivalent to being constant) has valence . Here the marked point counts as one towards the valence of the root vertex; in other words the root vertex can be constant with just two adjacent edges.
Finally, two sphere bubble trees are equivalent if
there is a tree isomorphism and a tuple of sphere biholomorphisms which preserve the tree, marked points, and pseudoholomorphic curves in the sense that
- preserves the tree structure, in particular maps the root to the root ;
- and for every and adjacent edge ;
- the pseudoholomorphic spheres are related by reparametrization, for every .