Difference between revisions of "Ambient space"
m |
m |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This section constructs topological ambient spaces <math>\mathcal{X}(\underline{x})</math> of the [[moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons]] <math>\overline\mathcal{M}(\underline{x})=\overline\partial_{J,Y}^{-1}(0)</math>, within which polyfold theory will construct the [[regularized moduli spaces]] <math>\overline\mathcal{M}(\underline{x};\nu)</math>. These will depend only on the choice of a Sobolev decay constant <math>\delta>0</math>. | This section constructs topological ambient spaces <math>\mathcal{X}(\underline{x})</math> of the [[moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons]] <math>\overline\mathcal{M}(\underline{x})=\overline\partial_{J,Y}^{-1}(0)</math>, within which polyfold theory will construct the [[regularized moduli spaces]] <math>\overline\mathcal{M}(\underline{x};\nu)</math>. These will depend only on the choice of a Sobolev decay constant <math>\delta>0</math>. | ||
− | Thus we are given Lagrangians <math>L_i\subset M</math> indexed cyclically by <math>i\in \Z_{d+1}</math> and a tuple of generators <math>\underline{x}=(x_0, \ldots, x_d) \in \text{Crit}(L_0,L_d)\times \ldots\times\text{Crit}(L_{d-1},L_d)</math> in their morphism spaces. The latter depend on the | + | Thus we are given Lagrangians <math>L_i\subset M</math> indexed cyclically by <math>i\in \Z_{d+1}</math> and a tuple of generators <math>\underline{x}=(x_0, \ldots, x_d) \in \text{Crit}(L_0,L_d)\times \ldots\times\text{Crit}(L_{d-1},L_d)</math> in their morphism spaces. The latter depend on the choices of Hamiltonian symplectomorphisms <math>\phi_i:=\phi_{L_{i-1},L_i}</math> so that <math>\phi_i(L_{i-1})\pitchfork L_i</math> whenever <math>L_{i-1}\neq L_i</math>, as specified in [[polyfold constructions for Fukaya categories]] and [[moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons]]. |
'''TODO: mention choice of Morse functions (? also in other places previously ?)''' | '''TODO: mention choice of Morse functions (? also in other places previously ?)''' |
Revision as of 00:30, 8 June 2017
table of contents Katrin's work in progress here
This section constructs topological ambient spaces of the moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons
, within which polyfold theory will construct the regularized moduli spaces
. These will depend only on the choice of a Sobolev decay constant
.
Thus we are given Lagrangians indexed cyclically by
and a tuple of generators
in their morphism spaces. The latter depend on the choices of Hamiltonian symplectomorphisms
so that
whenever
, as specified in polyfold constructions for Fukaya categories and moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons.
TODO: mention choice of Morse functions (? also in other places previously ?)
Then - as set - we define the ambient space as
where the data is the same as in the construction of the moduli spaces of pseudoholomorphic polygons , except for maps not necessarily being pseudoholomorphic but just of Sobolev
-regularity. We indicate these differences in boldface.
1. is an ordered tree with sets of vertices
and edges
,
equipped with orientations towards the root, orderings of incoming edges, and a partition into main and critical (leaf and root) vertices as follows:
2. The tree structure induces tuples of Lagrangians
that label the boundary components of domains in overall counter-clockwise order as follows:
3. is a tuple of generalized Morse trajectories
in the following compactified Morse trajectory spaces:
4. is a tuple of boundary points
that correspond to the edges of , are ordered counter-clockwise, and associate complex domains
to the vertices as follows:
5. is a tuple of sphere bubble tree attaching points for each main vertex
, given by an unordered subset
of the interior of the domain.
6. is a tuple of not not-necessarily-pseudoholomorphic trees of sphere maps
indexed by the disjoint union
of sphere bubble tree attaching points, and consisting of the following:
a. is a tree with sets of vertices
and edges
, and a distinguished root vertex
, which we use to orient all edges towards the root.
b. is a tuple of marked points on the spherical domains
,
indexed by the edges of , and including a special root marked point as follows:
c. is a tuple of not-necessarily-pseudoholomorphic sphere maps for each vertex,
that is each
is labeled by a continuous map
satisfying
Sobolev regularity and matching conditions as follows:
- TODO:
-Sobolev regularity ... on punctured spheres ?!?
- The matching conditions are
for each edge
.
7. is a tuple of not-necessarily-pseudoholomorphic disk maps for each main vertex, that is each
is labeled by a continuous map
satisfying the
TODO:
-Sobolev regularity - and make sure it implies uniform convergence
Moreover, each satisfies Lagrangian boundary conditions, and matching conditions as follows:
8. The generalized pseudoholomorphic polygon is stable in the following sense:
TODO: update to Ham pert, sphere bubble tree
- Any main vertex
whose map has zero energy
has enough special points to have trivial isotropy, that is the number of boundary marked points
plus twice the number of interior marked points
is at least 3.
- Each sphere bubble tree is stable in the sense that
any vertex whose map has zero energy
(which is equivalent to
being constant) has valence
. Here the marked point
counts as one towards the valence
of the root vertex; in other words the root vertex can be constant with just two adjacent edges.
Finally, two generalized pseudoholomorphic polygons are equivalent if there is a tree isomorphism
and a tuple of disk biholomorphisms
which preserve the tree, Morse trajectories, marked points, and maps in the sense that
TODO: add sphere tree iso: Finally, two sphere bubble trees are equivalent if
there is a tree isomorphism
and a tuple of sphere biholomorphisms
which preserve the tree, marked points, and pseudoholomorphic curves in the sense that
-
preserves the tree structure, in particular maps the root
to the root
;
-
and
for every
and adjacent edge
;
- the pseudoholomorphic spheres are related by reparametrization,
for every
.
-
preserves the tree structure and order of edges;
for every
;
-
for every
and adjacent edge
;
-
for every
;
-
for every
and
;
- the maps are related by reparametrization,
for every
.
The symplectic area function
If no Hamiltonian perturbations are involved in the construction of a moduli space of generalized pseudoholomorphic polygons - i.e. if for each pair the Lagrangians are either identical
or transverse
- then the symplectic area function on the moduli space is defined by
which - since only depends on the total homology class of the generalized polygon
Here is defined by unique continuous continuation to the punctures
at which
or
.
Differential Geometric TODO:
In the presence of Hamiltonian perturbations, the definition of the symplectic area function needs to be adjusted to match with the symplectic action functional on the Floer complexes and satisfy some properties (which also need to be proven in the unperturbed case):